Group structure is an area that we’ve been working on for a long time and with this release, we have included a feature that will simplify any lists you have created and improve your analysis. To show how this will be useful, let’s consider Specsavers. Specsavers has over 1000 companies in its group structure. The largest of these (by employee count) is shown below.Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.thedatacity.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

How we’re simplifying group structure on our product
Our new feature tackles this and you’ll find a new company filter: “Remove subsidiary companies”
After removing subsidiaries

Why remove subsidiaries?
A typical question that someone might answer in The Data City platform would be ‘how many people work in a given sector?’. It’s normal to take the list of companies and look at the number of employees associated with these companies. It annoys us a little to admit it is more complex than that. At the Data City we aim to simplify complexity wherever we can. One of the challenges that we’ve had for a long time is that companies can spread their operations over multiple corporate entities. This introduces the potential for double counting of financial variables, like employees or turnover.How subsidiary accounts can include double counting
For the sake of simplicity, let’s answer the question of ‘how many people does a company employ?’. Let’s use BP. Is BP’s total employment the sum of its employees across all its operating companies? In short, it’s not.
Matched Websites vs Group structure
The purpose of this example is to provide a bit more information on what we mean by group structure. Specifically, this example will explain the difference between matched websites and group structure, as well as explaining the source of group structure data. A core part of our business is matching companies to websites. Matching to websites and scraping those sites allows us to classify companies into what they do. For some companies, we’ll match a large number of entities to one domain. Peel Group is a good example. There are 203 companies matched to the peel.co.uk domain. Does that mean these 203 companies belong to the same group? Unfortunately, no. There can be multiple groups within one domain. In this case there are 9 groups assigned to the peel.co.uk domain. The implication of this is that we won’t be able to ‘deduplicate’ down to one company per domain. There are further reasons why we won’t always be able to consolidate a list of grouped companies down to one company. Our priority is to simplify your analysis without introducing errors. We will, however, be able to consolidate a large number of companies. If matched websites and group structure are separate, what is the source of the group structure? Our group structure data comes from our data supplier CreditSafe. CreditSafe parse financial statements to gather group structure data. Below is an example of where you can find the raw group structure data. For example, Peel Media Management Limited although it is a group in itself, has an ultimate parent called Tokenhouse Limited. [3]
FAQ
- Why do you require a list to contain the parent AND the subsidiary to consolidate?
- Tesco PLC was not identified using your filters
- It would be inaccurate to include all of Tesco PLC’s employees.